GQ-012 · Context that Preserves Intent

How can project owners retain the right intent and evidence while avoiding repeated full-context reconstruction?

SISO Open Source Foundation

experimental

scoped

Not declared

Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.

No selected release

Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact.

hybrid

Choose entry points, source retrieval, handoff content and compaction practices that preserve binding intent at a lower total reconstruction cost.

Recover the correct source, current constraint, owner and next action in a cold read. · Measure lost nuance, reconstruction effort and resulting rework alongside input size.

Reduced context omits a binding requirement or source correction that the comparison baseline recovers. · Retrieval and repair costs erase the reduction in repeated reading.

A smaller context or intact content hash does not establish authorship, intent preservation or improved outcomes.

New owner-approved outcome or counterexample changes the decision evidence. · The relevant source, operating constraint or acceptance boundary materially changes.

Public project entry and recovery contracts · Owner-approved comparisons of targeted source windows and complete-context baselines

A bounded comparison of entry, retrieval and recovery approaches with missed-intent cases, recovery cost and conditions for use.

Review when relevant owner evidence or decision conditions change; registration starts no collector, benchmark, scheduler or new execution lane.

public metadata only