{ "generated_at": "2026-09-05T13:45:00.000Z", "base_path": "/", "schema_version": "1.0.0", "snapshot_id": "gls:snapshot:adfaabc8-ee8f-442c-88ba-64c5879bc623", "snapshot_version": "38.0.0", "infrastructure_contract_url": "/docs/god-questions-infrastructure.html", "counts": { "questions": 8, "programmed_questions": 3, "assumptions": 7, "evidence_connections": 10, "challenge_edges": 2, "action_learning_links": 8, "public_answers_released": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 19115 }, "questions": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:2ac84615-3f9d-4040-95d6-9d9f39e4dc84", "question_id": "GQ-001", "slug": "frontier-question-agent-workspace", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-agent-workspace/", "question": "How should the complete agent workspace be designed across code layout, agent architecture, memory, enforcement, and agent-generated user interfaces?", "research_state": "partial", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "review_due", "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01", "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one cold reconstruction task against the typed workspace boundary and compare errors, intervention, and elapsed time with the prior evidence path.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "How to lay out a new agent workspace — what to enforce mechanically, what to leave to convention, and which patterns to refuse to repeat.", "success_criteria": [ "Each principle is graded by the evidence behind it and states whether it is a universal finding or a SISO preference — the answer_shape's own distinction, made checkable per principle rather than claimed for the set.", "Rejected patterns are recorded with the observation that rejected them, so a later reader can tell a tried-and-failed pattern from an untried one.", "Every architectural claim names a workspace where it was actually run, not a design sketch.", "A principle that has never been violated in practice is marked as untested rather than as confirmed." ], "falsifiers": [ "A principle stated as universal is contradicted by a workspace outside SISO, making it a preference that was mislabelled.", "The architecture cannot be described without naming a specific tool, meaning what was learned is a vendor workflow rather than a workspace design.", "Following the principles produces a workspace that a new agent cannot orient in — the design optimises for its author rather than for a cold reader.", "Enforcement mechanisms are routinely bypassed by the agents they govern, indicating the design describes intended rather than actual behaviour." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "Evidence comes almost entirely from a single workspace operated by a single agent, so 'universal' cannot yet be distinguished from 'true here'. The answer_shape demands exactly that distinction.", "Memory architecture is named in the question but only lightly exercised — no claim rests on measured memory behaviour.", "Agent-generated user interfaces have one instance (the observatory) and no comparison, so its design choices are untested against alternatives." ], "watch_triggers": [ "An enforcement mechanism (gate, hook, contract) is added or disabled, which changes what the workspace actually guarantees.", "A new agent joins the workspace and takes measurably longer to orient than the design predicts.", "A principle is violated in practice without the violation being caught, exposing an unenforced claim.", "Agent-generated UI surfaces begin carrying values that are not derived from a named source." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "public agent-workspace repositories", "code-layout and architectural enforcement", "memory and context systems", "agent-facing interface patterns" ], "answer_shape": "Evidence-graded principles, reference architectures, rejected patterns, and tests that distinguish universal findings from SISO preferences.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a major agent platform, workspace architecture, or failed forward prediction changes a load-bearing conclusion.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:0212a6f4-1860-453b-bb27-2e9ed70a09c4", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.0.0+ea7f0e4", "released_at": "2026-08-02T02:08:28+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": { "freshness": { "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one cold reconstruction task against the typed workspace boundary and compare errors, intervention, and elapsed time with the prior evidence path.", "assumptions": [ { "id": "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES", "level": "QA", "scope": "agent-workspace architecture", "statement": "A complete agent workspace can integrate its organs through typed interfaces without collapsing their independent ownership boundaries.", "status": "active", "confidence": "medium", "falsifier": "Representative workspace tasks require one organ to own another organ's durable state, evidence adjudication, and runtime authority to remain coherent.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ001-RESEARCH-METHOD" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ001-ADDRESSABILITY", "level": "QA", "scope": "workspace reconstruction", "statement": "Stable identities, typed relationships, and explicit receipts reduce the context a cold agent must reconstruct before useful work.", "status": "active", "confidence": "medium", "falsifier": "Cold-task comparisons show no meaningful reduction in reconstruction time, errors, or human intervention after adding the addressable contract.", "depends_on": [ "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES" ], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ001-LIBRARY-SEED" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" } ], "evidence_connections": [ { "id": "EC-GQ001-RESEARCH-METHOD", "source_type": "documentation", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/question-driven-research.html", "relevance_hypothesis": "The published organ and assumption boundaries provide a reusable frame for evaluating complete workspace architectures.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-001.json#evidence", "revision_or_digest": "registry-record:2026-08-01", "summary": "The question-driven research architecture separates identity, discovery, corpus, evidence transformation, and execution responsibilities.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ001-LIBRARY-SEED", "source_type": "release_receipt", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "registry/releases/frontier-question-gq-001-seed.json", "relevance_hypothesis": "The existing metadata seed tests whether a question can remain addressable while its partial answer stays unpublished.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "source-review:frontier-question-intake:gq-001:2026-08-01", "revision_or_digest": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "summary": "The immutable seed exposes publication-safe identity and scope without presenting the partial answer as a public artifact.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ001-ADDRESSABILITY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] } ], "action_learning_links": [ { "id": "AL-GQ001-DEMAND", "object_type": "epistemic_demand", "authority_state": "demand_only", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-001.json#research_contract", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:34:00+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ001-BOUNDARIES", "QA-GQ001-ADDRESSABILITY" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "The current question frame defines learning demand but grants no implementation or budget authority." } ] }, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 2, "evidence_connections": 2, "action_learning_links": 1, "serialized_program_bytes": 3425 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:e38b054f-b926-4410-b84d-4fd3249fd4f4", "question_id": "GQ-002", "slug": "frontier-question-agent-layer-efficiency", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-agent-layer-efficiency/", "question": "What changes would make the complete provider-neutral SISO agent layer ten times more effective per unit of time, attention, and compute?", "research_state": "partial", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "review_due", "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01", "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one paired agent task with and without the evidence-aware context and receipt path, including retrieval and repair overhead in the comparison.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "Where to spend the next unit of agent-layer engineering effort: fixing an existing path's economics versus substituting a model or harness.", "success_criteria": [ "Every recommendation in the leverage map carries a measurement taken on this fleet, not an estimate or a vendor claim.", "Each recommendation states a numeric success threshold that a later measurement could fail to meet.", "The map ranks by measured effect on tokens, latency, or attention per unit of delivered work — not by expected effort to implement.", "At least one recommendation has been applied and re-measured, with the before and after both recorded." ], "falsifiers": [ "The highest-ranked lever, once applied and re-measured, produces less than a 2x improvement on the metric it was ranked by. Measured on the Bifrost request log, not asserted.", "The ranking is unstable: re-deriving it from the same log a week later reorders the top three, meaning it described a moment rather than a structure.", "Aggregate gains are dominated by a single provider or harness, so the 'agent layer' framing is wrong and the question should be about that component instead.", "The measured bottleneck turns out to be human review or decision latency rather than tokens, latency, or compute, in which case no change to the agent layer reaches 10x." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "No before/after pair exists for any applied lever: scripts/minimax-cache-route.sh is written and tested but NOT APPLIED, so the largest predicted gain is unverified.", "Latency and attention are named in the question but only token economics have been measured. The ranking currently covers one of three axes.", "Cached-read rates are measured on the gateway log only. Whether they reflect provider-side billing is unconfirmed." ], "watch_triggers": [ "A provider's cached-read rate on the gateway log moves by more than 20 percentage points, changing the economics the ranking was built on.", "A new model or provider is added to the gateway, which can reorder the leverage map without any code changing.", "Any recommendation in the map is applied, requiring a re-measurement to confirm or refute its predicted threshold.", "Request volume on any provider falls below 100 in the trailing window, at which point per-request averages stop being trustworthy." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "public agent harnesses and orchestration systems", "released SISO Agent Stack components", "privacy-safe operational measurements", "memory, routing, budget, and handoff mechanisms" ], "answer_shape": "A ranked leverage map whose recommendations each carry measurements, external analogues, an experiment, and a falsifiable success threshold.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer after material stack changes or when new measurements overturn the current bottleneck model.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:b95eeca5-ed9d-48ac-858c-f6d62065cd29", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.0.0+ea7f0e4", "released_at": "2026-08-02T02:08:29+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": { "freshness": { "assessed_at": "2026-08-02", "review_due_at": "2026-09-01" }, "next_useful_work": "Run one paired agent task with and without the evidence-aware context and receipt path, including retrieval and repair overhead in the comparison.", "assumptions": [ { "id": "QA-GQ002-CONTEXT-VALUE", "level": "QA", "scope": "evidence-aware agent context", "statement": "Evidence-aware context improves representative agent-task outcomes enough to justify its retrieval and authoring overhead.", "status": "active", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "Paired representative tasks show no material correctness, intervention, reconstruction, or cost improvement after repair overhead is included.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ002-OPERATING-PLAN" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ002-LINEAGE-VALUE", "level": "QA", "scope": "agent outcome reconstruction", "statement": "Privacy-safe causal lineage and observation receipts make routing and capability decisions more reconstructable than untyped session summaries.", "status": "active", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "Independent reviewers cannot reproduce a routing or promotion decision more reliably from typed receipts than from the existing evidence path.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ002-SEED-REVIEW" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" } ], "evidence_connections": [ { "id": "EC-GQ002-OPERATING-PLAN", "source_type": "documentation", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/100-million-token-operating-plan.html#operating-loop", "relevance_hypothesis": "The published operating loop supplies falsifiable context and lineage pilots for testing agent-layer efficiency.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "docs/100-million-token-operating-plan.html#canonical-contracts", "revision_or_digest": "accepted-direction:2026-08-02", "summary": "The operating plan connects question demand, evidence, reversible experiments, measured outcomes, and returned learning without assigning truth to runtimes.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ002-CONTEXT-VALUE" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ002-SEED-REVIEW", "source_type": "source_review", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "reference": "source-review:frontier-question-intake:gq-002:2026-08-01", "relevance_hypothesis": "The intake review tests whether operational research can remain owner-held while a public question exposes only safe lineage.", "rights_state": "owner_held", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-002.json#evidence", "revision_or_digest": "source-review:2026-08-01", "summary": "The public Work records that operational evidence and the existing answer remain unpublished rather than copying sensitive measurements.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ002-LINEAGE-VALUE" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] } ], "action_learning_links": [ { "id": "AL-GQ002-DEMAND", "object_type": "epistemic_demand", "authority_state": "demand_only", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-002.json#research_contract", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:34:00+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ002-CONTEXT-VALUE", "QA-GQ002-LINEAGE-VALUE" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "The public frame requests evidence about agent-layer leverage while private measurements and execution authority remain owner-held." } ] }, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 2, "evidence_connections": 2, "action_learning_links": 1, "serialized_program_bytes": 3478 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:85964f1c-2efe-48b0-8f71-dc32bb668c0c", "question_id": "GQ-004", "slug": "frontier-question-best-software-primitive", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-best-software-primitive/", "question": "For a named software primitive, which implementation is best for the stated context, and is it safe and valuable to reuse, vendor, or learn from?", "research_state": "scoped", "lifecycle_status": "experimental", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "corpus", "decision_to_change": "Whether to build, vendor, reuse, or learn from an existing implementation of a named primitive.", "success_criteria": [ "Every candidate carries an explicit reason NOT to choose it, as the answer_shape requires — a shortlist without stated downsides is advocacy, not evaluation.", "The rights gate is applied and recorded per candidate before any code is vendored or reused, not after.", "Interface fit is assessed against the named context's actual call sites, not against the candidate's own documentation.", "Adoption cost includes the cost of removing the candidate later, not only of adding it." ], "falsifiers": [ "A shortlist recommendation is adopted and the stated adoption cost is exceeded by more than 2x, meaning the estimate was not grounded.", "Two candidates receive the same evidence grade on materially different amounts of evidence, showing the grade encodes confidence rather than evidence.", "The 'best' choice changes when the context is restated slightly, indicating the ranking tracked the phrasing rather than the requirement.", "A rights determination made here is later contradicted by the licence text, which would mean the gate is decorative." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "No primitive has been evaluated yet. This contract defines what an answer would have to satisfy; it does not report findings.", "No rights-gate procedure has been exercised end to end on a real candidate, so its cost and failure modes are unknown." ], "watch_triggers": [ "A candidate changes licence, which can invalidate a rights determination without any code changing.", "A candidate is archived or loses maintenance, changing adoption cost without changing interface fit.", "The named context's call sites change, which is what interface fit was assessed against." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "Foundry capability category selected by the requested primitive", "implementation and interface evidence", "maintenance, adoption, security, and license evidence", "counter-examples across language and scale" ], "answer_shape": "A context-specific ranked shortlist with interface fit, evidence grade, rights gate, adoption cost, and explicit reasons not to choose each candidate.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when the category gains a high-signal implementation, a selected project materially changes, or security and rights evidence changes.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:037ad734-0cc3-4afb-9dc0-c2b55f1dcee7", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:32:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:7782f923-d44e-4a47-8ce6-134e31816673", "question_id": "GQ-005", "slug": "frontier-question-field-momentum", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-field-momentum/", "question": "Which categories, techniques, and projects are gaining real momentum, what mechanisms explain the change, and what does the acceleration predict next?", "research_state": "scoped", "lifecycle_status": "experimental", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "corpus", "decision_to_change": "Where to direct research attention and which techniques to adopt early versus wait out.", "success_criteria": [ "Every predicted movement carries a date and a scoring rule fixed in advance, so it can later be marked right or wrong without renegotiation.", "Each movement names an observed delta with the measurement window it came from, not a general impression of momentum.", "Causal hypotheses are stated separately from the observations, so a correct observation with a wrong mechanism is visible as such.", "Leading indicators are things that can be checked without waiting for the outcome they predict." ], "falsifiers": [ "Dated predictions, once scored, do no better than a naive 'current trends continue' baseline.", "Movements are only ever identified after they are widely known, meaning the map lags rather than leads.", "The observed deltas are dominated by measurement artifacts — a source changing its reporting rather than the field changing.", "Confidence ratings show no correlation with which predictions later score correct, making them decorative." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "No movement map exists yet and no prediction has been made, so nothing can be scored. This contract sets the bar in advance, which is the only time it can be set honestly.", "The baseline covers primary language on one curated GitHub corpus. A categories x time axis IS constructible — 55,467 repos join between momentum.sqlite (3 days) and the curated taxonomy in identity.sqlite — but it does not yet yield a signal. Measured 2026-08-04: the top category by star gain (agent-extension-pack, 2.06/repo against a 0.045 baseline) draws 92.1% of its gain from ONE repository, and only 29 repos in the whole corpus moved at all across the three days. The window is too short, not the taxonomy too weak — which is the opposite of the awesome_sections failure and needs more observation days, not a different source.", "Star velocity is unusable FROM THE PEOPLE GRAPH — one distinct momentum_day (2026-07-11), star_delta null on 406,297 of 463,230 rows. CORRECTED 2026-08-04: a separate database, foundry-data/domains/github/momentum.sqlite, holds 170,062 repo_snapshot rows across THREE consecutive days (2026-07-09/10/11, ~56,687 repos each). Real deltas are computable there — 56,687 repos appear on all three days and the top mover gained 1,112 stars. So a velocity-based movement signal IS available; it was the graph that could not support it, not the machine. Three days is still a short window and the observations stop on 2026-07-11, so it cannot yet score a dated prediction." ], "watch_triggers": [ "A dated prediction reaches its date and must be scored.", "A tracked source changes how it reports, which can create an apparent delta with no real movement.", "A prediction is contradicted before its date, which is information that should not wait for the scoring window." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "frozen Foundry momentum snapshots", "category and capability movement", "release and adoption signals", "counter-signals that separate durable emergence from short-lived attention" ], "answer_shape": "A ranked movement map with observed deltas, causal hypotheses, confidence, leading indicators, and dated predictions that can later be scored.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer on a fixed cadence and whenever a leading indicator crosses a pre-registered materiality threshold.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:1ee81aa0-42cc-4bcd-a87b-4f34baf9cc13", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:33:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:2144e900-4886-461e-92f1-49571f2e9f74", "question_id": "GQ-006", "slug": "frontier-question-information-organ", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-information-organ/", "question": "How should the information organ continuously gather, preserve, query, and push valuable evidence into authorized agent workflows and self-improvement loops?", "research_state": "partial", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "Whether to trust a published Library number without re-deriving it, and whether an evidence path is sound enough to attach to a standing question.", "success_criteria": [ "Freshness is derived from observable state, never asserted by whoever last touched the record. A ledger entry that says 'fresh' must be checkable against the repository.", "Every number the organ publishes can be re-derived mechanically from a named source by a second program that did not produce it.", "Evidence attaches to a question by reference — byte ranges into sources — rather than by copying corpora into the registry.", "A delivery path that stops working becomes visible without anyone remembering to check it." ], "falsifiers": [ "A published number cannot be re-derived from its named source, and the disagreement is invisible until a human notices. This has fired repeatedly: a hyphen/underscore path typo reported 0 source inventories when 6 existed, because the builder and the checker shared the wrong path.", "The freshness mechanism produces so many false positives that its output is routinely dismissed — a gate that cries wolf is worse than no gate. This fired once: hardening a verifier marked all 10 claims stale at once.", "Maintaining the organ costs more attention than the decisions it improves.", "The organ reports a pipeline as healthy while that pipeline has never actually run end to end. This fired on 2026-08-04: outbox/sent/ was empty — zero escalations ever delivered — while the queue was reported as merely 'queued'." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "Escalation delivery is automated but still unproven end to end: zero messages have been delivered because the peer has been offline the whole time. The drain is verified to run and no-op correctly; it has never been verified to succeed.", "No independent reviewer has checked any claim. Eight claims await review, and self-review cannot satisfy the criterion that a second party can re-derive the numbers.", "Push freshness into agent workflows is named in the question but unbuilt: the organ currently publishes and waits to be read rather than pushing into a loop." ], "watch_triggers": [ "A gate is added, narrowed, or disabled — each changes what the organ can detect and can silently reduce coverage.", "A derivation's named source moves or is renamed, which makes file-count silently return 0 rather than error.", "Any delivery or ingestion path reports success without a receipt proving the far end received something.", "A published surface begins carrying a hardcoded value where it previously carried a measured one." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "public source-acquisition and retrieval systems", "Library Research Works and their public contracts", "privacy-safe health and freshness evidence", "feedback-to-learning mechanisms" ], "answer_shape": "A verified operating architecture with explicit ownership, freshness contracts, query primitives, feedback loops, failure modes, and observed end-to-end receipts.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a source lane, retrieval contract, or learning loop materially changes or fails its freshness guarantee.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:8225da3f-9a19-45d8-880e-0f2539756c0f", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:34:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:3b4c4fa6-31f2-4cfc-9542-00f32e200621", "question_id": "GQ-008", "slug": "frontier-question-model-routing", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-model-routing/", "question": "Which available model should own each recurring work shape after quality, reliability, tool use, latency, quota, and cost are evaluated together?", "research_state": "partial", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "Which model owns each recurring work shape, and whether an observed cost gap justifies changing the model or fixing the gateway path it was measured through.", "success_criteria": [ "Every cell in the routing matrix carries an evidence grade and the request volume it was derived from, so a reader can tell a measured cell from an assumed one.", "Each recommendation names the work shape it applies to, not just the model — a matrix that ranks models without scenarios has not answered the question asked.", "Cost and latency figures are derived from the gateway request log by a re-runnable query, never from vendor pricing pages or estimates.", "The matrix distinguishes provider capability from gateway configuration, so a defect in the path is not recorded as a property of the model." ], "falsifiers": [ "A cell's recommendation, once routed to in production, is reversed on re-measurement — the model it named is not in fact best for that work shape.", "Two cells derived from fewer than 100 requests each disagree with cells derived from thousands, indicating the matrix is reporting sampling noise as routing signal.", "A measured cost gap between providers disappears once gateway configuration is corrected, meaning the matrix ranked a misconfiguration rather than a model. This has already partially fired: MiniMax reads 0 cached tokens through Bifrost and 2,944 of 3,033 through the local proxy.", "Quality or tool-use reliability cannot be measured on this fleet at all, in which case the matrix covers only cost and latency and must say so rather than implying a complete answer." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "Quality and tool-use reliability are named in the question but unmeasured. Only cost, cache behaviour, and volume have been derived, so the matrix currently answers a narrower question than it poses.", "The MiniMax cache defect is isolated but NOT FIXED: scripts/minimax-cache-route.sh is written and tested, awaiting a topology decision. Every MiniMax cost figure describes a known-broken path.", "Latency is not yet extracted from the gateway log, so the 'latency' axis of the question is unevidenced.", "Cached-read counts come from the gateway log; whether they match provider-side billing is unconfirmed." ], "watch_triggers": [ "Any provider's cached-read rate on the gateway log moves by more than 20 percentage points.", "A model is added, removed, or re-versioned on the gateway.", "Gateway topology changes — including applying scripts/minimax-cache-route.sh, which would invalidate every MiniMax cost cell.", "Trailing-window volume for any provider drops below 100 requests, at which point its per-request averages stop being trustworthy." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "current public benchmark suites", "first-party provider documentation", "privacy-safe real-task outcomes", "quota, latency, and cost constraints" ], "answer_shape": "A versioned scenario-by-model routing matrix plus a machine-readable table, evidence grade per cell, and explicit re-evaluation triggers.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a tracked model, benchmark, price, quota, or material real-world task result changes.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:a5e56fcf-e19d-4ead-8c7d-9660d41ed47e", "release_kind": null, "version": "registry-seed-2026-08-01", "released_at": "2026-08-01T22:35:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 0, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release has no public answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:3e220d53-cd95-4e28-922e-5018e808ee92", "question_id": "GQ-009", "slug": "frontier-question-god-questions-infrastructure", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-god-questions-infrastructure/", "question": "How should the Great Library make God Questions visible, composable, continuously updated, and connected to evidence, decisions, approved action, and capability learning without becoming the corpus warehouse or execution runtime?", "research_state": "researching", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "review_due", "assessed_at": "2026-08-03", "review_due_at": "2026-08-17", "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Stand up the operating loop on always-on hardware: a single agent whose domain is improving the Library/Foundry/people-graph system, with a public dossier surface showing data bucket counts, question states, and what it changed and when. Evidence selection must be question-driven given the measured extraction ceiling.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "Which registry fields, Library projections, evidence interfaces, and action-return contracts should become the standard infrastructure for every SISO God Question?", "success_criteria": [ "A cold human or agent can find every standing question, its state, decision target, evidence gaps, falsifiers, watch triggers, and current answer lineage from one generated Library surface.", "Existing repositories, books, videos, research, and operational receipts can attach to a question through owned evidence systems without being copied into the public registry.", "A question can justify a bounded action candidate and later receive a verified learning return without the Library authorizing or executing the action.", "At least one repeated mechanism discovered through a question can be evaluated and promoted into its independently owned capability Work." ], "falsifiers": [ "The design requires a second question registry or central operational database to remain coherent.", "The visible dossier accumulates metadata but cannot improve a real research, routing, or investment decision.", "Useful evidence cannot be connected without leaking private corpora, machine paths, client data, or operational topology into the public Library.", "Maintaining the question contract costs more attention than the repeated research and decision errors it prevents." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "No evaluated end-to-end user flow yet proves that the portfolio view helps a cold operator choose the next valuable investigation.", "Claim, contradiction, assumption, experiment, mandate, observation, and learning-return objects do not yet share one proven cross-system receipt contract.", "No three-question cohort yet measures authoring overhead, evidence reuse, decision impact, or capability promotion rate.", "MEASURED 2026-08-04: extraction does not scale to the corpus. Claim extraction over the 932-book philosophy shelf alone needs ~400M tokens against a 150M budget (267%); the full 41.5M-passage corpus needs ~33,200M (22,133%). The budget covers ~187,500 passages. So evidence selection must be question-driven; 'extract everything and index it' is arithmetically impossible, not merely wasteful.", "The retrieval unit is unresolved. Passages are the evidence substrate but not the search surface -- a paragraph is not a thing you can agree or disagree with. Claims (position + grounding quote + confidence) are ~2 orders of magnitude fewer and match the Evidence Engines ingest contract, but the extraction layer that produces them does not exist.", "No standing agent operates the loop. Every piece of infrastructure built to date is supply; nothing continuously reads a question, finds bearing evidence, and updates an answer. This is the gap between a warehouse and an organ." ], "watch_triggers": [ "A new God Question cannot express a decision target, falsifier, evidence gap, or refresh condition in the current contract.", "Foundry or Knowledge ships a question-addressable export that can replace a manual evidence link.", "The first approved experiment returns an Observation Receipt and exposes a missing Library lineage field.", "Three heterogeneous questions complete a full research-to-decision loop and justify stabilizing or deleting provisional fields.", "A standing agent proposes a change to the Library or Foundry and it survives independent review -- the first evidence that self-improvement is real rather than asserted." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "gls:work:2fa08dac-937a-44d3-a547-f16ac28c4e25", "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "name": "The Great Library of SISO", "library_url": "/works/great-library-of-siso/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "homepage", "label": "Homepage", "url": "https://great-library-of-siso.pages.dev/", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:2fa08dac-937a-44d3-a547-f16ac28c4e25", "name": "Research", "library_url": "/works/research/", "source_links": [] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "the existing Frontier Question Works, metadata seeds, answer-lineage model, and question-driven research architecture", "the generated Research index and individual Question Work reading surfaces", "publication-safe Foundry, Knowledge, Evidence Engine, Event, ADR, Release, and Snapshot interfaces", "privacy-safe receipts from real research, routing, repository, book, and implementation work" ], "answer_shape": "A versioned God Questions operating architecture with a generated Observatory, machine-readable question-program contract, evidence and action-return interfaces, ownership boundaries, acceptance fixtures, and explicit promotion and kill gates.", "refresh_policy": "Re-answer when a real question cannot use the contract, a source or action interface changes, three-question evaluation evidence lands, or measured operating overhead exceeds the value created.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:df8a236d-b092-4d51-9e17-d1016671db64", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.1.0+0066cfa", "released_at": "2026-08-02T05:13:21+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": { "freshness": { "assessed_at": "2026-08-03", "review_due_at": "2026-08-17" }, "next_useful_work": "Stand up the operating loop on always-on hardware: a single agent whose domain is improving the Library/Foundry/people-graph system, with a public dossier surface showing data bucket counts, question states, and what it changed and when. Evidence selection must be question-driven given the measured extraction ceiling.", "assumptions": [ { "id": "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "level": "QA", "scope": "Library identity and projection", "statement": "The existing Work, Release, Snapshot, and Event spine can support question-program visibility without a second registry.", "status": "active", "confidence": "medium", "falsifier": "A heterogeneous question cannot express and validate its current program or answer lineage without a separate source of identity truth.", "depends_on": [], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ009-CONSTITUTION", "EC-GQ009-CHECKPOINT", "EC-GQ009-OPERATOR-PASS", "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "level": "QA", "scope": "question reconstruction economics", "statement": "A compact assumption, evidence, and action-learning projection improves cold-reader reconstruction enough to justify its authoring overhead.", "status": "challenged", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "Cold readers or agents cannot reconstruct a decision path more accurately, or the repeated authoring cost exceeds the errors and rediscovery avoided.", "depends_on": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION" ], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ009-CHECKPOINT", "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" }, { "id": "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY", "level": "QA", "scope": "action and learning authority", "statement": "Typed public references can connect question demand to returned learning without granting approval, execution, or evidence-adjudication authority to the Library.", "status": "challenged", "confidence": "low", "falsifier": "A real action-to-learning chain cannot remain reconstructable unless the Library stores private payloads or represents a proposal as approval or observation as accepted truth.", "depends_on": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION" ], "evidence_connection_ids": [ "EC-GQ009-JOINT-BRIDGE", "EC-GQ009-PRIVACY-FAIL", "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION" ], "review_date": "2026-08-02" } ], "evidence_connections": [ { "id": "EC-GQ009-CONSTITUTION", "source_type": "documentation", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/god-questions-infrastructure.html", "relevance_hypothesis": "The canonical constitution exposes the minimum identity, ownership, interface, dependency, and falsification rules the substrate must implement.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso/commit/270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "revision_or_digest": "270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "summary": "The pushed constitution preserves question identity, organ boundaries, action authority, learning proposals, and explicit later or rejected scope.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-CHECKPOINT", "source_type": "repository", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso/commit/270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "relevance_hypothesis": "The verified document checkpoint tests whether the existing generator can expose a canonical question-infrastructure reader without a second registry.", "rights_state": "public", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "repo-check:god-questions-infrastructure:270c37c", "revision_or_digest": "270c37c35a73a0a866a24d8b52b4be2ed7eacf60", "summary": "The exact branch checkpoint passed the complete Library gate and published the authored and generated constitution plus Research navigation.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE" ] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-JOINT-BRIDGE", "source_type": "registry_record", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "reference": "registry/events/2026-08-02-god-questions-infrastructure-program-started.json#evidence", "relevance_hypothesis": "The start Event's public bridge evidence tests whether action and learning ownership can be referenced without copying its owner-held design payload.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "workspace-handoff:glos-100m-frontier-joint-lineage-20260801", "revision_or_digest": "event-evidence:2026-08-02", "summary": "The public Event records the typed, approval-gated bridge while the Library remains limited to safe identity and lineage.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-OPERATOR-PASS", "source_type": "operational_receipt", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso/commit/68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "relevance_hypothesis": "Independent cold-reader and contract replay test whether the canonical projection improves reconstruction and remains backward compatible.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "verification-receipt:sha256:7befd52df946173b9754dd20b03fc5da1dde8b6327876768481e1a14ca86c2ae", "revision_or_digest": "68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "summary": "Independent cold-reader and contract lanes reconstructed the operator path and verified canonical human and agent projections at the exact pushed checkpoint.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-PRIVACY-FAIL", "source_type": "operational_receipt", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso/commit/68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "relevance_hypothesis": "The independent privacy adversary tests whether typed public metadata actually prevents owner-held text, topology, credential, timing, or truth-state leakage.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "verification-receipt:sha256:7befd52df946173b9754dd20b03fc5da1dde8b6327876768481e1a14ca86c2ae", "revision_or_digest": "68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "summary": "The privacy lane found that free-text metadata and temporal or truth-state edges needed stronger validation; the mixed receipt is verified observation, not accepted truth.", "supports_assumption_ids": [], "challenges_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ] }, { "id": "EC-GQ009-ESTATE-RECONCILIATION", "source_type": "source_review", "owning_work_id": "gls:work:9b18cc64-7d5e-4f30-b63d-a0ec30c1f7e1", "reference": "docs/estate-reconciliation.html", "relevance_hypothesis": "A reviewed public candidate cohort tests whether existing Library identities and explicit no-change or deferral outcomes can absorb estate learning without a second registry or automatic promotion.", "rights_state": "public_metadata_only", "publication_state": "public_safe_metadata", "observed_at": "2026-08-02", "provenance_receipt": "owner-review-receipt:sha256:9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "revision_or_digest": "9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "summary": "Four public repository observations resolved to two existing Work links, one historical no-change result, and one owner and license-review deferral; no source or registry identity was automatically promoted.", "supports_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "challenges_assumption_ids": [] } ], "action_learning_links": [ { "id": "AL-GQ009-DEMAND", "object_type": "epistemic_demand", "authority_state": "demand_only", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "registry/works/frontier-question-gq-009.json#research_contract", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:33:07+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "GQ-009 defines the decision, falsifiers, evidence gaps, and expected answer without authorizing implementation." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-CANDIDATE", "object_type": "action_candidate", "authority_state": "proposal_only", "owner_role": "operating_architecture", "reference": "gls:event:43f26801-1225-4650-90eb-7a1362760f8d", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T00:33:08+07:00", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-DEMAND" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "proposed", "summary": "The active initiative is represented as a bounded action candidate; approval and execution receipts remain separately owned." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-MANDATE", "object_type": "execution_mandate", "authority_state": "approved_scope", "owner_role": "decision_owner", "reference": "authorization-receipt:sha256:dc93428fcc4624a54d3e341ce87a7c3a31a10288510a63726d2644789bfccdd3", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T01:31:58+07:00", "content_sha256": "dc93428fcc4624a54d3e341ce87a7c3a31a10288510a63726d2644789bfccdd3", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-CANDIDATE" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "approved", "expires_at": "2026-08-02T07:31:58+07:00", "summary": "Shaan approved a six-hour bounded infrastructure, verification, and closeout envelope; the private authorization payload remains owner-held and only its digest is public." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-OBSERVATION", "object_type": "observation_receipt", "authority_state": "observation_only", "owner_role": "independent_verifier", "reference": "https://github.com/sisodias/great-library-of-siso/commit/68386b8d27eb269de3fdbb482ccbd5e8e7fffbc3", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T01:58:30+07:00", "content_sha256": "7befd52df946173b9754dd20b03fc5da1dde8b6327876768481e1a14ca86c2ae", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-MANDATE" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "verified", "truth_state": "not_adjudicated", "summary": "The mixed independent observation passed cold-reader and contract reconstruction but failed privacy hardening, producing a bounded repair requirement rather than an accepted answer." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-LEARNING", "object_type": "learning_return", "authority_state": "learning_proposal", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "learning-return-receipt:sha256:dd48a2a2b541175ea0a239131545a521c95caf6d268201fdf5b8a5fe7389de65", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T01:59:30+07:00", "content_sha256": "dd48a2a2b541175ea0a239131545a521c95caf6d268201fdf5b8a5fe7389de65", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-OBSERVATION" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "no_change", "truth_state": "not_adjudicated", "summary": "The Learning Return proposes the privacy and temporal repairs now under verification while keeping GQ-009 researching, publishing no Answer Release, and promoting no capability." }, { "id": "AL-GQ009-ESTATE-LEARNING", "object_type": "learning_return", "authority_state": "learning_proposal", "owner_role": "question_steward", "reference": "learning-return-receipt:sha256:9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "recorded_at": "2026-08-02T05:07:20+07:00", "content_sha256": "9d69335c5a5d7f2ba85e8fdeb37102136af0fd5747f34c06b05cc4624c611e61", "predecessor_ids": [ "AL-GQ009-OBSERVATION" ], "related_assumption_ids": [ "QA-GQ009-CANONICAL-EXTENSION", "QA-GQ009-METADATA-VALUE", "QA-GQ009-OWNER-BOUNDARY" ], "status": "no_change", "truth_state": "not_adjudicated", "summary": "Owner-reviewed estate reconciliation supports the existing identity and authority boundaries, records no new Work or inventory, keeps the deferred candidate outside promotion, and proposes no Answer Release." } ] }, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 3, "evidence_connections": 6, "action_learning_links": 6, "serialized_program_bytes": 12212 } }, { "work_id": "gls:work:38dfc806-5a03-45ae-84fc-266f3cacd7be", "question_id": "GQ-010", "slug": "frontier-question-gq-010", "library_url": "/works/frontier-question-gq-010/", "question": "How do we increase the People Graph's research and decision value by 100× without treating row count as value or weakening identity quality, provenance, rights, privacy, reproducibility, and reversibility?", "research_state": "scoped", "lifecycle_status": "active", "steward": "SISO Open Source Foundation", "freshness": { "state": "not_declared", "assessed_at": null, "review_due_at": null, "as_of": "2026-09-05" }, "next_useful_work": "Define the minimum public-safe question program before scheduling research.", "evidence_mode": "hybrid", "decision_to_change": "Choose which source classes, identity methods, temporal and claim layers, query surfaces, and operating loops to fund, merge, revise, or kill for the next evidence-backed People Graph release.", "success_criteria": [ "Breadth: demonstrate at least tenfold source-native observation coverage across four distinct source classes, with every promoted observation carrying source, native identifier, observed-at time, rights state, provenance, and receipt references.", "Resolution quality: on a versioned stratified benchmark, auto-accepted identity links achieve at least 99.5% precision, recall and abstention are reported separately, and every accepted merge or alias remains reversible with literal evidence.", "Research depth: for at least 100 prioritized people or 25 named research questions, expose a three-layer path from raw observation to cited claim to explicit adjudication, with no unsupported cross-source assertion presented as fact.", "Decision value: in at least five pre-registered operator or research decisions, the graph changes the selected action or reduces evidence-retrieval time by at least 80% against a measured baseline; additional rows alone cannot satisfy this criterion.", "Rights and privacy: every promoted observation has an explicit rights state, restricted or discovery-only material never appears as a public payload, and living-person data is limited to justified public or authorized evidence.", "Reproducibility and cost: the accepted increment rebuilds from versioned manifests, produces comparable quality reports, and stays within a declared per-source acquisition and refresh budget." ], "falsifiers": [ "Source expansion increases rows or edges by at least tenfold but produces no measured improvement in the five decision-use cases.", "Auto-accepted identity precision falls below 99.5%, accepted links cannot be reversed, or ambiguous names are silently merged.", "Any promoted public record lacks a rights state, leaks restricted payloads, or exposes unjustified sensitive information about a living person.", "New source pilots mostly duplicate existing low-signal entities and cannot produce replayable source-native observations with receipts.", "The graph remains a collection of names and topics without cited claims, temporal context, contradiction handling, or adjudication.", "Refresh and build costs exceed the declared budget without a proportional improvement in resolution, research depth, or decision value." ], "evidence_gaps": [ "There is no agreed baseline for current evidence-retrieval time, decision changes, or operator utility.", "The exact People Graph source commit has not been proven as a clean reproducible build in this registry lane, and the reviewed v2 builder's schema path does not match the tracked schema location.", "A versioned identity-resolution benchmark with precision, recall, abstention, collision, living-person, and historical-person strata is not yet published.", "Source-specific terms, privacy, retention, and redistribution rules are incomplete for the proposed scholarly, software, AI, creator, and media pilots.", "The pg-observation-0.1 interchange has not yet been exercised end to end through Foundry discovery, Evidence Engine adjudication, and canonical graph admission.", "Historical references under a different GitHub owner remain a verification and migration question rather than an assumed alias." ], "watch_triggers": [ "Any identity benchmark regression, disputed auto-merge, rollback, or evidence-loss incident.", "Any source terms, rights, privacy, API, rate-limit, or retention change that alters admissible observations.", "A parallel source pilot publishes a replayable observation set and draft handoff.", "The v3 schema, identity, query, claims, build, or integration lane publishes a compatibility contract.", "The first five decision-use cases receive measured baselines and post-change outcomes.", "Review at least monthly until a first Answer Release, and immediately after a material source, schema, quality, or governance change." ], "source_work_ids": [ "gls:work:2b03baa8-6dab-4e91-ab4c-9b8db4543236", "gls:work:35d3f881-43f3-4da5-87b0-abf694f387ef", "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f" ], "source_works": [ { "work_id": "gls:work:2b03baa8-6dab-4e91-ab4c-9b8db4543236", "name": "SISO People Graph", "library_url": "/works/siso-people-graph/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-people-graph", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-people-graph#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:35d3f881-43f3-4da5-87b0-abf694f387ef", "name": "SISO Book Library", "library_url": "/works/siso-book-library/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-book-library", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-book-library#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:44d2c4da-9998-4d60-b6d1-93465ac25302", "name": "SISO Knowledge", "library_url": "/works/siso-knowledge/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge", "visibility": "private" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-knowledge#readme", "visibility": "private" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:ec664d93-df93-48c5-be40-5d0165886c01", "name": "SISO Foundry", "library_url": "/works/siso-foundry/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-foundry#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] }, { "work_id": "gls:work:231aab36-e763-4374-bc94-3a09fd3bf49f", "name": "SISO Evidence Engines", "library_url": "/works/siso-evidence-engines/", "source_links": [ { "kind": "source_repository", "label": "Source repository", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines", "visibility": "public" }, { "kind": "readme", "label": "Read README", "url": "https://github.com/sisodias/siso-evidence-engines#readme", "visibility": "public" } ] } ], "source_scopes": [ "SISO People Graph code and contract at de048bb3b34bf931b56fd741cb46c1334acdfb98", "SISO Book Library code and contract at be9ab0831b9ea8802d6898f3a3dfa8a61c63e80b", "Publication-safe outputs from the thirteen named parallel lanes and their draft handoffs", "Public or authorized source observations expressed through pg-observation-0.1; raw restricted payloads remain outside the registry" ], "answer_shape": "A source-by-source and capability-by-capability decision matrix separating breadth, resolution quality, research depth, decision value, rights and privacy, reproducibility, and cost, with explicit fund, merge, revise, or kill recommendations and traceable evidence.", "refresh_policy": "Reassess on every material lane handoff and at least monthly until a first evidenced Answer Release; afterward refresh on source-contract, rights, schema, identity-quality, cost, or decision-utility triggers.", "publication_boundary": "public_metadata_only", "selected_release": { "id": "gls:release:f8ddbc97-e795-474a-b9c1-e508bd9e1787", "release_kind": "question_program_metadata", "version": "program-metadata-1.0.0+57320d3", "released_at": "2026-08-06T22:24:00+07:00", "artifact_count": 1, "public_answer_state": "not_released", "public_answer_note": "Not released — the selected Release contains question-program metadata, not an answer artifact." }, "program": null, "authoring_metrics": { "assumptions": 0, "evidence_connections": 0, "action_learning_links": 0, "serialized_program_bytes": 0 } } ] }